Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addie Wagenknecht

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 05:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Addie Wagenknecht

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable per Wikipedia:Notability. Has not made a significant contribution to the field that merits an article; page is mostly self-promotion and seems to have many edits by the article's subject. New Media Theorist (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably delete for now unless this can be improved as my searches found nothing better than this, this, this and this. SwisterTwister talk 17:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass notability requirements for either academics or artists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.